Ports have always been places of coordination. Ships arrive and depart, cargo changes hands, and a network of pilots, tugboats, terminal operators, and authorities keeps everything moving. For decades, these operations relied almost entirely on people being physically present on the water or along the quay.

That notion of “presence” is slowly evolving. 

Across the maritime sector, autonomy is moving from experimentation to real-world application. Not as a futuristic vision of fully automated ports, but as a practical way to deal with growing operational complexity. In busy maritime hubs, where traffic density is high and safety margins are tight, autonomy is less about replacing people and more about supporting them with better (digital) tools.

In that sense, the conversation around autonomy is shifting. The real question is no longer whether ships will one day operate autonomously, but how autonomy can help ports manage their operations more effectively today. For ports such as Port of Antwerp-Bruges, this shift is already becoming tangible.

The practical case for autonomy 

Jonathan Van Cauwenberge, Port of the Future Advisor at Port of Antwerp-Bruges frames autonomy as a strategic, stepwise approach, not necessarily an end goal. “The question isn’t whether full automation will arrive — it’s how incremental experiments reshape workflows, responsibilities, and the definition of presence,” he says. The port’s interest is in practical applications: reducing risk, optimizing staff deployment, and improving safety and operational efficiency without compromising operational continuity. 

At the same time, ports must keep traffic flowing safely and efficiently every single day. Autonomy offers a possible solution, but only if it’s approached realistically. 

Autonomous systems already tackle tasks that are repetitive, time-sensitive, or risky: drones that inspect infrastructure and tele-operated or partially crewed vessels that extend capacity without increasing risk and operational barriers. Each initiative is a building block toward broader autonomy. The human factor remains central, though. Operators intervene when judgment or safety decisions are required, ensuring that autonomy complements rather than replaces expertise.

From passion project to operational experiment: MAHI 

While strategic vision defines the context, much of the innovation comes from partnerships with technology specialists. MAHI, a Belgian technology company, provides a clear illustration. What started as a passion project — an unmanned, solar-powered vessel crossing the Atlantic to collect environmental data — has evolved into a company focused on technology for operational maritime applications. 

Pieter-Jan Note, MAHI’s CEO, explains: “Our goal isn’t to build vessels — it’s to build, validate, and optimize technology for real maritime vessel operations.” As part of an exploration track in Zeebrugge, the company’s Mahificent vessel operated under a hybrid model, handling routine tasks autonomously while human operators remained responsible for decision-making, safety, and (unexpected) interventions. During those trials, operators remotely handled the vessel to perform inspections, and on-board crew responded to unexpected incidents, such as removing plastic litter from the water, demonstrating how autonomy integrates into practical workflows for future deployment. 

“Autonomy doesn’t replace people, it amplifies their skills.” - Jonathan Van Cauwenberge 

The human factor in a hybrid approach 

A recurring misconception is that autonomy in ports threatens jobs. In reality, the opposite is often true. Autonomous systems remove repetitive and hazardous work, allowing operators to focus on complex, high-value tasks. For example, operators who once handled inspections manually can now monitor multiple vessels and intervene when their expertise is needed.

Pieter-Jan Note emphasizes the learning curve since the Mahificent’s tests: “Operators become proficient quickly, especially when they have prior maritime experience.” 

“Autonomy doesn’t replace them, it amplifies their skills.” Van Cauwenberge adds, “Hybrid systems allow staff to intervene immediately during incidents while using technology to manage routine tasks. It’s a shift in responsibilities, not a replacement of jobs.”

This shift also responds to a growing challenge across many ports: a shortage of skilled personnel. Maritime operations depend on experienced operators and technicians, yet finding enough experienced people is becoming increasingly difficult — especially for roles that require long periods working on the water. Remote operation and autonomous systems can help ease that pressure.

Incremental implementation and scaling

Autonomy in ports is being implemented step by step, with controlled experiments informing broader deployment. Tele-operation, drones, and partially crewed vessels on water, road, and rail are all tested and integrated gradually. The aim is not a sudden leap to full automation, but a careful evolution that balances safety, trust, and operational impact. 

Long-term visions for the port of the future also include fully integrated digital systems managing cargo flows like a “physical internet”. However, each step is measured and informed by real operational data. By starting small and scaling carefully, ports can identify risks, refine workflows, and build confidence among operators. 

MAHI’s platforms exemplify this approach. The Mahificent validates autonomous operations in real port conditions, while the Alpha 8, a high-speed craft, supports operator training and rapid-response scenarios. Both platforms feed back into the development of operational procedures, technology improvements, and safety protocols.

“Our goal isn’t to build vessels — it’s to test, validate, and optimize technology for real operations.” - Pieter-Jan Note

Autonomy, sustainability, and local innovation can go hand in hand 

Autonomy is also aligned with environmental and innovation objectives. MAHI’s vessels, for example, incorporate electrification where possible, demonstrating that autonomous systems can contribute to emission reductions and sustainability goals. Local development accelerates the feedback cycles and regulatory alignment — strengthening the domestic maritime technology ecosystem. 

This local, hands-on approach allows for rapid experimentation without the delays and uncertainties of international development, showing how autonomy can simultaneously advance resilience, sustainability, and operational efficiency.

A shift in perspective

The experiences of Port of Antwerp-Bruges and MAHI illustrate a broader lesson: autonomy in ports is not a futuristic dream; it is a strategic, practical response to real operational challenges. It changes what it means to “be present” in a port: operators retain oversight and control, while machines handle repetitive, risky, or labor-intensive tasks.

In the end, the conversation isn’t about fully automated ports or futuristic visions — it’s about how human and machine collaboration can make modern ports smarter, safer, and more sustainable today. Port of Antwerp-Bruges is not waiting for perfection; it is experimenting, learning, and applying autonomy where it matters most.

‍

‍

Want to learn more on the topic?

Join the panel discussion hosted by Antwerp Innovation Powerhouse on day 1 of SuperNova:
From Port to Planet: How Autonomy is Redefining the Way We Move
With Koen Schietecatte, Kamran Ali, Jonathan Van Cauwenberge, and Ben Verlinden.

‍